Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Pfahler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1924No. Appeals, Nos. 189 and 190PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

These appeals by plaintiffs are from the trial court’s refusal to take off a compulsory nonsuit in an action by husband and wife for personal injuries to the latter. The defendant, Dr. George E. Pfahler, has offices in Philadelphia where he and his assistants are engaged, inter alia, in taking and developing X-ray photographs. The wife plaintiff, Mrs. Sarah F. Nixon, while having X-ray photographs taken of her teeth in defendant’s offices on March 2, 1920, was injured by an electric spark which struck her right knee and passed down and out at her foot.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. LeBarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Stearns v. Ontario Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Stemons v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. English v. FreeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Wohlert v. SeibertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jones v. Harrisburg Polyclinic HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Robinson v. WirtsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Bierstein v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Baxter v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kuehnemann v. BoydWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API