Legal Opinion

Corporate Health Insurance v. Texas Department of Insurance

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 18, 1998No. Civil Action H-97-2072PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILMORE, District Judge.

ORDER

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss, which has been converted into a motion for summary judgment, (Instrument No. 10), and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, (Instrument No. 20). Based on the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants’ and Plaintiffs’ motions should be GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.

I. Background

Plaintiffs Corporate Health Insurance, Inc., Aetna Health Plans of Texas, Inc., Aet-na Health Plans of North Texas, Inc., and Aetna Life Insurance Company bring this action against…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Puryear v. County of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Azurix Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
  3. Franks v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
  4. Rievley Ex Rel. Rievley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1999
  5. Crum Ex Rel. Estate of Crum v. Health Alliance-Midwest, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API