Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth Belt Ry. Co. v. Cabell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1913PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

Appellee instituted this suit to recover damages for personal injuries, and secured a verdict and judgment for ?5,000, which upon a hearing of the motion for a new trial was reduced by remit-titur to 83,000.

Every step in the proceeding seems to have been skillfully and vigorously contested in behalf of appellant, but, after a careful consideration of the record, we have failed to find an error for which we think the judgment must be reversed.

As alleged and supported by testimony, ap-pellee’s injuries were received under substantially the following circumstances; Appellee at the time was in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Annis v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Roberts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  3. Taliaferro v. GoudelockTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hardin v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Hart-Parr Co. v. Krizan MalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API