Legal Opinion
San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Behne
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 11, 1917No. 5788PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKey, C. J.
The following statement is copied from appellant’s brief:
“This suit was instituted against appellant by appellees to recover damages for the death of their two sons, Ed and Manuel Behne, alleged to have,been caused by the breaking and floating down of appellant’s trestle in Elm creek valley, bearing down in its wake a tree which ap-pellees’ sons had climbed; they having been caught in said valley by an unusually sudden overflow, and having taken refuge in the tree from the rapidly rising water. Appellant’s general demurrer and special exceptions to appel-lees’ petition were overruled. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Washington v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Mexican National Railway Co. v. MussetteTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Shippers Compress & Warehouse Co. v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Paris & G. N. R. v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Louisiana, A. & T. Ry. Co. v. De VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.