Legal Opinion
Williams v. Belknap
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 24, 2001No. CIV. 00-40183PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GAD OLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the motions for summary judgment of Defendant Belknap [docket entries 62 and 88] and Defendant Donnelly [docket entry 89], as well as Defendant Donnelly’s motion to impose sanctions on Plaintiffs counsel, filed on July 17, 2001. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e), the Court concludes that a hearing would not aid in the disposition of these motions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny each of these motions. The Court will also order attorney Cynthia L. Reach to show cause in writing as to why she is not in violation of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Indiana Insurance v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Carico v. Benton, Ireland, & StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Thermodyn Corp. v. 3M Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Gaddis Ex Rel. Gaddis v. Redford TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Midland Funding LLC v. BrentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.