Thermodyn Corp. v. 3M Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
Introduction
Before the Court are a number of motions. Plaintiff Thermodyn Corporation filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 73). Defendants 3M Company and Dyneon LLC (together, “3M7Dyneon”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 72), as did Defendants Cary Kaufman and his companies, FKM Industries and Silaflex, Inc. (together, the “Kaufman Defendants”) (Doc. No. 75). Plaintiff filed a Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 80). Finally, Plaintiff Thermodyn and the Kaufman Defendants filed a Joint Stipulation for Consolidation…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- James B. Oswald Co. v. Dennis NeateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Mp Totalcare Services, Inc. v. MattimoeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- BlueEarth Biofuels, LLC v. Hawaiian Electric Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Avery Dennison Corp. v. TransAct Technologies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sal's Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Bers Acquisition Co., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.