Legal Opinion
Manney v. Monroe
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 27, 2001No. 97 C 7483PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Plaintiff Hen ry Manney (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Manney”) sued Defendants Denise Monroe, Michael Moore, John Mueller, Joseph Chin, and Cermak Health Services under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) (West 2001) for allegedly violating his constitutional and civil rights. Specifically, Mr. Manney claims that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lacedra v. Donald W. Wyatt Detention FacilityDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Rivera v. Lake CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Coleman v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Asarco LLC v. NL Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
- Cholopy v. City of ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.