Legal Opinion

United States v. Coronado Beach Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 1921No. Nos. 524 and 525PublishedCited by 31 opinions

ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The cases are stated, in. the opinion. The Mexican Colonization Law of. August 18, 1824, by its 5th article, expressly reserved to the federal government the right to make use of any portion of lands within ten leagues of the sea coast, for the purpose of national defense.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The cases are stated, in. the opinion. The Mexican Colonization Law of. August 18, 1824, by its 5th article, expressly reserved to the federal government the right to make use of any portion of lands within ten leagues of the sea coast, for the purpose of national defense. See Hall’s Mexican Laws, §§488-502. This applies to all of the national lands to be distributed under this law, and not only to lands to be colonized by foreigners. Arguello v. United States, 18 How. 539/ did not…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

These cases arise out of a proceeding brought by the United States under the Act of July 27, 1917, c. 42, 40 Stat. 247, for the double purpose of ascertaining the rights of private parties in North Island in the harbor of San Diego, California, and of condemning the whole of said island for public purposes after the value of such rights has been fixed and paid into Court. The proceeding was begun by a bill in equity against the Coronado Beach Company. In its answer that Company alleged titile to the whole island, and after a hearing obtained a decree in its favor, subject to the question of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Maria De La Solidad De Arguello and v. The United States. The United States v. Maria De La Solidad De ArguelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Chunie v. RingroseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Baker v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. United States v. O'DONNELLSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API