Legal Opinion

United States v. O'DONNELL

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 1938No. 487PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This case involves the validity of the title of the United States to a part of Mare Island in San Francisco Bay, which was reserved for public purposes by Presidential Proclamation in 1850, was selected by the Secretary as a navy yard pursuant to Act of Congress, was reserved for that purpose by Presidential Order in 1853, and since 1854 has been so used.

The lands in question are in the area acquired as a result of the Mexican War by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, July 4, 1848, 9 Stat. 922, which guaranteed the property rights of Mexicans in the annexed territory. The United States claims…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Allen v. Trust Co. of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. State of Texas v. BalliTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Comstock v. Group of Institutional InvestorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API