McNab & Harlin Manufacturing Co. v. Paterson Building Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bin of interpleader. On final bearing upon statements of defendants of the grounds of their several claims to liens by stop notices under section 3 of the Mechanics’ Lien law.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, Y. C.
After the fund ($5,027.97) had been paid into court in pursuance of the decree of interpleader, the ten defendants filed their respective “concise statements,” setting forth the grounds of their respective claims in accordance with the practice established by rule 221. The litigation thus set in court was brought to a final hearing on June 8th and 9th, 1905. After the testimony had been taken and counsel had been heard in regard to each claim, I announced orally my conclusions, setting forth in each case the reasons why the claim was either allowed in its place as a lien…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beckhard v. RudolphNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morley v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Independent Trust Corp. v. Stan Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Cox v. HruzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Arrow Builders Supply Corp. v. Hudson Terrace Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954