Legal Opinion
Morley v. McCaskey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1928No. 18972PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASON, V. C. J.
This was an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on lot 8, block 3, Morley addition to the. city of Tulsa, and the improvements thereon, brought by the defendant in error, W. L. McCaskey, sole trader doing business as W. L. McCaskey Company, as plaintiff, against Sherman Reagan and Lula Clare Reagan, his wife, Raisa E. Morley, J. E. Shinpoeh, and several other persons and corporations.
Briefly, the facts arte: That Mr. Morley, the plaintiff in error, was the fee owner of several lots, including lot 8, block 3 of) Morley addition to the city of Tulsa; that Sherman Reagan was in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Vane v. NewcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Producers' Lumber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Basham v. Goodholm & Sparrow Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Bohmar Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Haggard v. Sunray Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.