Legal Opinion

Beckhard v. Rudolph

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 4, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill of interpleader. Final heading on defendants’ statements of claims.

1Opinion of the Court

Stevenson, V. C. (orally).

This is an interpleader case. The bill is filed by Martin Beckhard, the owner of the building with which we are concerned in this case, against James Rudolph, the contractor, between whom and the complainant there was a written contract for the construction of the building, duly filed in the clerk’s office, and also against four other parties who claim to have furnished materials used in the building or performed labor in its erection, and on that account claim to have liens upon the money due from the complainant, Beckhard, to the defendant, the contractor, Rudolph,…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matzinger v. Harvard Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Inhabitants of Bordentown v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  3. McNab & Harlin Manufacturing Co. v. Paterson Building Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  4. United States ex rel. Calvin Tomkins Co. v. Clifford F. MacEvoy Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
  5. Gardner & Meeks Co. v. HeroldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API