Legal Opinion
Cox v. Hruza
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
54 N.J. Super. 54 (1959)
148 A.2d 193
BELFORD C. COX, T/A B.C. COX LUMBER CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LESLIE HRUZA, ET UX., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 2, 1959.
Decided February 5, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Edward S. Miller argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy, attorney).
Mr. J. Peter Davidow argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause of action entered in defendants' favor by the Cumberland…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friedman v. SteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Columbia Lumber & Millwork Co., Inc. v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- McNab & Harlin Manufacturing Co. v. Paterson Building Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- Austin v. LeerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Arlington Realty Co. v. GluckNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Muccio v. CroninNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Inganamort Bros. v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Adams v. Kenson Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Range v. McLartyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Gay v. MujicaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964