Legal Opinion

Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2007No. 05-35830PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

476 F.3d 1031

OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center; Cascadia Wildlands Project; Siskiyou Regional Education Project; Friends of the Living Oregon Waters; National Center for Conservation Science and Policy, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

David B. ALLEN, in his official capacity as Regional Director for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's Pacific Region; U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-35830.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted July 28, 2006.

Filed February 16, 2007.

Kristen L. Boyles, Earthjustice, Seattle,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. LohnDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
  3. Yurok Tribe v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. Sierra Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API