Legal Opinion

Yurok Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 8, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-06863-WHOPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTIONS TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

This order addresses parallel motions brought in two related cases, Yurok Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, No. 16-cv-6863, and Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, No. 16-cv-4294. The plaintiffs in these two cases are tribes and fishing associations, seeking to protect Southern California Northern California Coast Coho salmon in the Klamath River from nega*455tive impacts of the Klamath River Project. In both cases plaintiffs have moved for summary…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. BurmanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
  5. Friends of the Clearwater v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API