Legal Opinion
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. National Marine Fisheries Service
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 8, 2017No. Case No. 16-cv-04294-WHOPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTIONS TO STRIKE, AND MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
This order addresses parallel motions brought in two related cases, Yurok Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, No. 16-cv-6863, and Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Bureau of Reclamation, No. 16-CV-4294. The plaintiffs in these two cases are tribes and fishin'g associations, seeking to protect Southern California Northern California Coast Coho salmon in the Klamath River from negative impacts of the Klamath River Project. In both cases plaintiffs have moved for summary…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Wild Fish Conservancy v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. SavageDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
- Friends of the Clearwater v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Friends of the River v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.