Legal Opinion

General Woodcraft & Foundry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1049 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Joseph Besco (claimant) here seeks workmen’s compensation benefits for a disability allegedly resulting from an accident suffered in the course of his employment. He was working as a carpenter for General Woodcraft & Foundry (General Woodcraft), when, in the course of remodeling an old house, he claims to have become violently ill because of exposure to sewer gas escaping from an exposed pipe in the basement. As a result of this incident, he further claims to have *359developed an acute labrynthitis, which has rendered him totally disabled.

The referee found that the claimant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Leipziger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lieberman v. Sunray Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Fronko v. United States Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Malocheski v. Consolidated Cigar Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Besco v. General Woodcraft & FoundryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Anderson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Chadwick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Young v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co. v. St. JohnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API