Strack v. Strack
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The affidavits filed in support of and in opposition to the motion present a question of law without any substantial issues of material fact to be tried. Therefore this is a case proper to be disposed of by summary judgment. Laffey v. Milwaukee (1959), 8 Wis. (2d) 467, 472, 99 N. W. (2d) 743.
The affidavits show without dispute that Flodeen was hired by the appellants to work on appellants’ farms near Janesville. ITis workday begins when he reaches the “home farm,” usually about 7 a. m. and ends about 2 p. m. His pay starts when he gets to the home farm. When he arrives there a foreman tells…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by12 opinions
- Olsen v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Olson v. ConnerlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Scott v. Min-Aqua Bats Water Ski Club, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Olston v. HallockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- DeRuyter v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.