Legal Opinion

Strack v. Strack

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The affidavits filed in support of and in opposition to the motion present a question of law without any substantial issues of material fact to be tried. Therefore this is a case proper to be disposed of by summary judgment. Laffey v. Milwaukee (1959), 8 Wis. (2d) 467, 472, 99 N. W. (2d) 743.

The affidavits show without dispute that Flodeen was hired by the appellants to work on appellants’ farms near Janesville. ITis workday begins when he reaches the “home farm,” usually about 7 a. m. and ends about 2 p. m. His pay starts when he gets to the home farm. When he arrives there a foreman tells…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Olsen v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Olson v. ConnerlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Scott v. Min-Aqua Bats Water Ski Club, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Olston v. HallockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. DeRuyter v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API