Legal Opinion

Ætna Insurance v. Rico

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 24, 1927No. 11,720PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Rico had judgment on trial to the court on insurance policies for losses of certain grain stacks by fire. The company brings error and moves for supersedeas.

The policies contained a clause which required proof of loss within sixty days. The proof was never given. The plaintiff pleaded express waiver and the evidence thereof was in dispute. There were no special findings. The judgment therefore must be regarded as based on a general finding for the plaintiff, (Montrose Co. v. Greeley Bank, 78 Colo. 240, 242, 241 Pac. 527) and this requires us to presume waiver.

The defendant claims that there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Jones v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. McMillan v. HarbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Soule v. KunkleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co. v. WyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Alamosa v. HolbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Stotts v. StottsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Kahnt v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API