Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 11, 2007No. 05-CV-6537LPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION & ORDER

PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

Named plaintiffs Margarita Sherrill and Tony Falso initiated this lawsuit as a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and as a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to pursue claims under the New York Labor Law. 1 (Docket # 1). Since then, thirty-eight additional individuals have sought to “opt-in” to this action, each having filed a consent to be added as a plaintiff. Currently before this Court is plaintiffs’ motion to conditionally certify this action as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Realite v. Ark Restaurants Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Gjurovich v. Emmanuel's Marketplace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
  5. Jackson v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Trinidad v. Pret A Manger (USA) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Summa v. Hofstra UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. Bifulco v. Mortgage Zone, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  4. Russell v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API