Legal Opinion
Summa v. Hofstra University
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 1, 2010No. 07 CV 3307(DRH)(ARL)PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the Court are Defendant Hofstra University’s (“Defendant” or “Hofstra”) objections to the August 14, 2008, 2008 WL 3852160, Order of Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay (the “Order”) which (1) conditionally certified a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“Section 216(b)”); (2) ordered that the conditional class consist of “all Hofstra Undergraduate or Graduate Assistants within the past three years who did not receive the prevailing minimum wage and/or overtime…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Valerio v. RNC Industries, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Rosario v. Valentine Avenue Discount Store, Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Yap v. Mooncake Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Moore v. Eagle Sanitation, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.