Legal Opinion
E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 2, 1942No. 5402PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKIN, District Judge.
This case was heard on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The reason assigned for the motion was that defendant’s patent 1,779,195 (referred to in the briefs and in this memorandum as T95) is invalid for two reasons: (1) That certain essential features of the division patent were not disclosed in the original application and that therefore as matter of law the patent is not entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the original application and is for that reason without validity as against admitted prior uses, (2) that the patent was invalidated by the filing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Milcor Steel Co. v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Vance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Hailes v. Albany Stove Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- American Optical Co. v. New Jersey Optical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1944
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. Republic Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
- EW Bliss Company v. Cold Metal Process CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
- Messing v. Quiltmaster CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.