Legal Opinion
United States v. Roth
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 30, 1999No. 98-0270/ARPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge COX
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, we are called upon to decide if the “military judge abused her discretion by refusing to allow appellant to offer a sentencing witness in rebuttal” to the Government’s *188evidence in aggravation.1 We conclude that she did, and we reverse.
Appellant and some accomplices broke into his unit supply room located in the headquarters building at Fort Lewis, Washington. They stole 11 pairs of night vision goggles and some computer equipment. When the theft was discovered, the unit went into lock-down for a month. A high priority…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Michigan v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. BlascoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PomarleauCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. Rodriguez-RiveraNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. RothArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. StewardNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. BeaumontNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.