Legal Opinion

United States v. Roth

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 22, 2002No. ARMY 9600441PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

CARTER, Judge:

This is a sentence rehearing case in which appellant, relying on our decision in United States v. Kinsch, 54 M.J. 641 (Army Ct.Crim.App.2000), asserts that he suffered cruel and unusual punishment when his left testicle was painfully and permanently injured during a weapons frisk by a prison guard “totally without penological justification.” For the reasons stated herein, we disagree.

At a general court-martial composed of officer members, appellant pleaded guilty to wrongful disposition of military property (two specifications), in violation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrightArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  2. United States v. FlynnArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API