Loughran v. Reynolds
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
In this action for damages for breach of contract, judgment was rendered in favor of a defendant in his individual capacity, after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. The effect of the judgment was to leave a corporate defendant in the case and to release an individual sued on the same cause of action.
There is no question but that the complaint states a cause of action as to damages. The only possible contention is whether or not the facts alleged in the complaint apply to the individual defendant and are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cruz v. Ramírez de ArellanoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
- Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hennessey's Tavern, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Loughran v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.