Legal Opinion

Loughran v. Reynolds

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1942No. Civ. 13444PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

In this action for damages for breach of contract, judgment was rendered in favor of a defendant in his individual capacity, after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s first amended complaint without leave to amend. The effect of the judgment was to leave a corporate defendant in the case and to release an individual sued on the same cause of action.

There is no question but that the complaint states a cause of action as to damages. The only possible contention is whether or not the facts alleged in the complaint apply to the individual defendant and are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Ramírez de ArellanoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Hennessey's Tavern, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Loughran v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. In Re Hedgeside Distillery Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API