Legal Opinion
Claim of Kaplan v. Wirth & Birnbaum
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
These companion appeals present a common question of law, certified to us by the Appellate Division in each case, as follows: ‘ ‘ Under the facts in this case, does the Board have the power and jurisdiction to reopen the claim against the Special Fund for Reopened Cases under the Compensation Law?”
The facts in each case are not in controversy. The Kaplan claim, based on an injury (hernia), which allegedly occurred on October 22,1934, as a result of claimant’s having picked up a sixteen-pound pressing iron, was originally disallowed by the *124Workmen’s Compensation Board on June 8, 1935, after a…
2Cited by7 opinions
- D'Ornellas v. Roger Maffei, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Charles W. Ennis v. Kennedy Valve Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Kulpa v. Alco Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Claim of Magidson v. Strategic Telemarketing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Hooper v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.