Legal Opinion

Claim of Magidson v. Strategic Telemarketing, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 1, 2008, which ruled that claimant’s claim could not be reopened pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 123.

In October 1993, claimant, who identified herself as president of her employer, a telemarketing company, filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits alleging that she was totally disabled *1218as a result of her exposure to toxic chemicals in the apartment where she worked. Her claim was disputed and, in May 1994, when neither claimant nor her attorney appeared for a scheduled hearing, a Workers’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Ford v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Claim of Kaplan v. Wirth & BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Leary v. NYC Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Cagle v. Judge Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. D'Ornellas v. Roger Maffei, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Cozzi v. American Stock Exch.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API