Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claim of Hooper v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1961Published

1Dissent

Herlihy, J. (dissenting).

In July, 1945, a routine physical examination by the appellant disclosed that the claimant employee suffered from a recurrent bilateral hernia which the appellant in its report of injury and the attending physician in his report designated as “ occupational ”.

A board physician confirmed the hernial condition at a hearing held August 28, 1945. The appellant did not controvert the *148claim and the claimant at the hearing said he did not yet want an operation. The Beferee then found that claimant had developed a recurrence of the bilateral hernias; that it was caused by his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Casey v. Hinkle Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Claim of Kaplan v. Wirth & BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API