Legal Opinion

Claim of Kulpa v. Alco Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by a self-insured employer from an award covering various periods between December 14, 1945 and March 19, 1953, based upon reduced earnings due to *748partial disability causally related to an industrial accident of May 31, 1945. Appellant contends: (1) that the claim is barred by section 123 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law; (2) that if there be any liability it should have been charged to the Fund for Reopened Cases under section 25-a, and (3) that there was insufficient evidence of causally related disability during the periods involved. Claimant was injured on May 31, 1945; he filed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kaplan v. Wirth & BirnbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Claim of Pytel v. Carborundum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Hayes v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API