Legal Opinion

Roche v. District of Columbia

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 26, 1883No. 151PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION.

2Opinion of the Court · RichardsonRichardson, J.

The claimant moves for a new trial of his case, decided at the present term (ante, 217), and assigns five grounds therefor: four for alleged errors of fact, and one of law.

As to the facts, it is not alleged that there has been discovered any new evidence bearing upon them. Pages of the printed record are referred to as all that is relied upon in support of the alleged errors. The evidence thus referred to was all before the court at the hearing,- was commented upon by claimant’s counsel, and was carefully and fully considered by the court in making up its judgment. The case was not…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calhoun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1878

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  2. Seldovia Native Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  3. Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API