United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. Film
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
We noted probable jurisdiction to review a summary-decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California holding that § 305(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 46 Stat. 688, as amended, 19 U. S. C. § 1305 (a) was “unconstitutional on its face” and dismissing a forfeiture action brought under that statute.1 The statute provides in pertinent part:
“All persons are prohibited from importing into the United States from any foreign country . . . any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, writing, advertisement, circular, print, picture, drawing, or other representation, figure, or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by515 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
510 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.