Legal Opinion

Eubank v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1997No. 23397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

This is a post-conviction relief proceeding brought by Thomas Eubank. The district court summarily dismissed the action on the ground that Eubank’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitation. We affirm the action of the district court.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Following a jury trial Eubank was convicted of two serious felonies, first degree burglary and sexual abuse of a child. Based upon these convictions, and upon a determination that Eubank was a persistent violator under I.C. § 19-2514, the district court imposed a single sentence for a fixed term…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stuart v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Aeschliman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Hooley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API