Legal Opinion

Abeles v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1973No. L.A. 29883PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for 60 days.

Petitioner, who was admitted to practice in 1955, has no prior disciplinary record. In the instant proceeding he was charged with, inter alia, wilfully violating rule 12 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which provides that “A member of the State Bar shall not communicate with a party represented by counsel upon a subject of controversy, in the absence and without the consent of such counsel. . . .” (See Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6077.)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Barreiro v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Mitton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Leoni v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Chronometrics, Inc. v. Sysgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. TRIPLE a MACHINE SHOP, INC v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API