Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scalfaro v. Rudloff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 2007No. 127 MAP 2006Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

In creating a trust for the ultimate benefit of their children, the Rudloffs used a form-book “living trust” document believed by the parties to have been obtained from a stationery store and executed without the benefit of legal advice. I respectfully differ with the majority’s conclusion that the instrument is clear and definite; rather, I believe that the document is poorly drafted and materially ambiguous.

For purposes of this appeal, the critical portion of the declaration of trust is the revocation provision contained in its paragraph five, as follows:

We reserve unto ourselves the power…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Ingels EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Jessup EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Solomon's Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. In Re Estate of BurgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API