Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Burger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2006No. 16 WAP 2005PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

In this appeal, Appellant challenges a determination that she lacks standing to pursue a will contest. The outcome turns on a statutory rule of interpretation applicable to wills, which embodies the public policy disfavoring partial intestacy.

*167In March 2000, Regis F. Burger, M.D. (“Dr. Burger”) prepared the last of a series of several wills, in which he named five beneficiaries to share in the residue of his estate. Dr. Burger was a widower with no children of his own, and the residuary legatees were the heirs of his deceased sister, Anzelma Burger Nash, including her…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. In Re Estate of McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  3. McFerren EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Woodward EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Conlin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McMeekin v. Gimbel Brothers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. In Re Estate of HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. C. Meade v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. County of Fulton v. Sec. of Com., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. In Re Estate of BurgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API