Legal Opinion

Jessup Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1970No. Appeal, 280PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

The question involved is whether the gift of the remainder in the trust for Jenny vested at the death of the testator or at the death of Jenny.

The question of whether a bequest or devise created a vested interest (or a vested subject-to-be-divested interest), or a contingent interest has perplexed and vexed the Courts for countless years. This question arises most frequently in wills or trusts which, like the present, use the word “surviving,” and particularly when (as here) “surviving” is used in different context in the same will.

The testator, August E.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Newlin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Burleigh EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Houston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Dinkey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Hope EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Banes EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Benson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Stancik EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Lilley EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API