Loeb v. Berman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Motion to dismiss appeal taken from certain orders entered in the minutes of the court in the above-entitled cause on August 9, 1932. Several grounds are urged for the dismissal but, being satisfied that appellants are riot aggrieved parties within the meaning of the statute governing appeals, we rest our action upon a brief discussion of this question alone.
The Sunset Pacific Oil Company, a corporation, is the successor of the Julian Petroleum Corporation. Appellants, a portion of a group of stockholders of said corporations, urged that- a cause of action existed against Jacob Berman and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Reynolds v. Churchill Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Fratessa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HoffaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
- Singer v. Allied Factors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Russell v. WeyandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Denicke v. Anglo California Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.