Legal Opinion
Denicke v. Anglo California Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1944No. 10329PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment in a derivative suit (entered pursuant to Rule 23(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c) approving a compromise and directing a dismiss al. An appeal was taken also from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment.
The record comprises almost 2,000 printed pages and the briefs are very long, but the questions presented are relatively simple. The suit was filed in November 1938 by appellant Denicke, 1 a stockholder ot appellee Anglo California National Bank (herein for brevity called the Bank.) At the time…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Fleishhacker v. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Russell v. WeyandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,401 J. Ralph Saylor v. Thayer Lindsley, and Roseanne Horn, Michael J. McLaughlin Objectors-Appellants, and Abraham I. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Gerald Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Levin v. Mississippi River Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Miriam J. Wolf v. Curtis BarkesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.