Reynolds v. Churchill Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County. James P. Lodge, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
This is a contest instituted by the plaintiff in the office of the surveyor-general of the state and by him referred by proper order to the superior court of the county of Siskiyou, as provided in sections 3414, 3415 of the Political Code. The plaintiff claims a right to purchase land involved by reason of applications made in the office of the surveyor-general in 1917 and contests the prior application and certificate of defendant’s assignor. The defendant claims the right to purchase the land under and by virtue of an application filed in the office of the county surveyor of the county of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Fresno Flume & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Youle v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Loeb v. BermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Robison v. SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- People v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Cockrell v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.