State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jason Turner Johnson, Appellant
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The State’s right to appeal a jail credit determination following the revocation of probation and the execution of a stayed sentence arises by necessary implication from the State’s express right to appeal a probation revocation decision under Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 27.04, subdivision 3(4)(a). Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-0245 Court of Appeals Procaccini, J. Took no part, Gaïtas, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: July 2, 2025 Office of Appellate Courts Jason Turner Johnson, Appellant. ________________________ Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Richard Schmitz, Assistant State Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for appellant. Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Brian J. Melton, Clay County Attorney, Megan J. Kelly, Assistant County Attorney, Moorhead, Minnesota, for respondent. ________________________ SYLLABUS…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Welfare of C. W. S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.