Legal Opinion

Willis v. Besser-Churchill Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Case by Samuel T. Willis against the Besser-Churehill ■Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff, while operating a circular saw for defendant, severely injured his hand. For this injury he brought suit and recovered judgment. The case is brought here by writ of error. Many questions are xaised by counsel, but we think one of them is decisive.

The plaintiff was a man of at least ordinary intelligence, 37 years old. According to his testimony, he had lived in the lumber region about 15 years, and had worked around or about sawmills 8 or 9 years. He worked 30 or 35 days in defendant’s mill, taking bolts from the drag saw to the cut-off table. He quit work for a time, when he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sjogren v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Toomey v. Eureka Iron & Steer WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Kean v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Schroeder v. Michigan Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lamotte v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Jerry Madden Shingle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Storrs v. Michigan Starch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Welling v. Kalamazoo Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Espeseth v. HayesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API