Legal Opinion

Lamotte v. Boyce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1895PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Bay. (Maxwell, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment for per*547sonal injuries received through a fall from a ladder in the defendant’s sawmill, where he had been engaged for a month or more in firing a boiler. The ladder consisted of strips of wood nailed upon a wooden post or stanchion, which supported the wall encasing the boiler, and which extended a foot or 18 inches above the brickwork. It was intended as a means of reaching the top of the boiler. The sawdust carrier passed over the boiler, and sawdust scattered upon the top of the boiler and ignited upon the night in question. The sawdust was swept from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Batterson v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Ry. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. EbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kaukola v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Jones v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Sakol v. RickelMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API