Legal Opinion

Storrs v. Michigan Starch Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Case by Addison E. Sfcorrs against tbe Michigan Starch Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff, while at work for defendant, was injured by coming in contact with some of its machinery. For these injuries he sued the defendant, and recovered a judgment. The case is brought here by writ of error.

According to the testimony of plaintiff, he was 22 years of age when he received his injuries. For seven years he had worked in a basket factory, making baskets upon a form. There was some machinery in this factory, but plaintiff says he did not work in that part of the building where the machinery was. He also worked about three weeks in a sawmill, carrying slabs from a slitting saw.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hutchins v. Priestly Express Wagon & Sleigh Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. King v. Ford River Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Balle v. Detroit Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Fisher v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowers v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Stoll v. HawksMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API