Legal Opinion

Buss v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1926No. 26,603PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This suit was commenced on three causes of action, one for damage to real property, and two for damage to crops caused by an overflow of water brought about by an obstruction to the flow thereof through a natural watercourse. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on one cause of action for damage to crops, and the defendant appeals.

The cause was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and answered special questions. There was no mo*690tion for a new trial. The questions answered by the jury were as follows:

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. CuppySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Broadway Manufacturing Co. v. Leavenworth Terminal Railway & Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. City of Kansas City v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Beard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Lynch v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jeakins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Henderson v. TalbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Gowing v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. McMullen v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. Lackey v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API