Legal Opinion

McMullen v. Jennings

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1935No. 32,065PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages arising from the maintenance of á nuisance.

Although the facts of this case warranted the furnishing of a map or plan sufficient to aid the court in visualizing the scene and. the relation of events to locality, under subdivision (e) of rule 6 of this court, none has been supplied, but from the abstracts we learn the following undisputed facts: In the eastern part of the city of Hutchinson is a block of ground fronting on Second street. Facing north on this street is a row of nineteen houses, and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Parker v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Stotler v. RochelleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Lackey v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Jeakins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Steifer v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Adams v. City of Arkansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API