Legal Opinion
Crescent Ring Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Walker, Chancellor.
For brevity the parties will be called herein the Ring Company and the Indemnity Company.
The Ring Company brought suit in the Essex Circuit against the Indemnity Company on two counts — first, in toft for deceit, and second, on a parol contract of insurance, which latter was abandoned at the trial. The first count alleges that Nearing was agent of the Indemnity Company to sell policies and make and enter into contracts, of insurance in the name of the company; that on or about December 31st, 1919, he induced the Ring Company to order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- American Insurance v. NeibergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
3Cited by32 opinions
- Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Martinez v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Mesce v. Automobile Association of New JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Schustrin v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New YorkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.