Paulsen Estate, Inc. v. Naches-Selah Irrigation District
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to recover interest on certain irrigation district bonds, which accrued at the-legal rate after the principal of the bonds became due and payable. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. From the judgment entered dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.
The facts which will present the question here for determination may be summarized as follows: The Naches-Selah irrigation district had issued bonds in a considerable amount, and the plaintiff was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Ingram v. SausetWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- First National Bank v. White-Dulaney Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co. v. Seattle-Tacoma Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Sprague Avenue Investment Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1940