Pallen v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRYE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, package car drivers employed by United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using hand-held computers known as delivery information acquisition devices (DIADs) in the performance of their jobs. Before the court is the motion of defendant Inforite Corp. for summary judgment (# 151); the motion of defendant Toppan Moore Co., Ltd. for summary judgment (# 152); the motions of defendants United Parcel Service General Services Co. and II Morrow, Inc. for summary judgment (# 155); and the motion of defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Benson and Ford, Inc., D/B/A Ford Gas Co. v. Wanda Petroleum Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.