Legal Opinion

Pallen v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 17, 1998No. CIV. 95-713-FRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, package car drivers employed by United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using hand-held computers known as delivery information acquisition devices (DIADs) in the performance of their jobs. Before the court is the motion of defendant Inforite Corp. for summary judgment (# 151); the motion of defendant Toppan Moore Co., Ltd. for summary judgment (# 152); the motions of defendants United Parcel Service General Services Co. and II Morrow, Inc. for summary judgment (# 155); and the motion of defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Benson and Ford, Inc., D/B/A Ford Gas Co. v. Wanda Petroleum Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API