Legal Opinion
Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1992No. 91-55263PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
An arbitration panel dismissed state negligence and fraud claims brought against Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., as part of Isabel Clark’s securities action. The district court concluded that the dismissal did not have preclusive effect on Clark’s federal claims under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5. The court denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., and Gary W. Hankins, a former Bear Stearns broker, appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and we affirm.
I
Arbitratio…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Cobb v. PozziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- James Mills v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Hydranautics v. Filmtec Corporation, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Khalil Janjua v. Donald NeufeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.