Saar v. Saar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
This appeal is from the judgment entered on a verdict obtained by the plaintiff in an action of trespass. The appellant vigorously argues that the court should have granted his motion for judgment n. o. v. or at least have ordered a new trial for defects in the charge to the jury. Some reference to the testimony is necessary in considering the contentions advanced by the appellant.
The plaintiff, Joseph Saar, at the request of his brother, the defendant, who operates a truck, came to the latter’s home to assist him in a moving job. He found the defendant woifiring at his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Petrie v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Fredericks v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Scurfield v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Gordon v. S. M. Byers Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Tropical Paint & Oil Co. v. Sharon Building Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Commonwealth v. RicciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Lamara, to Use v. AdamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Varano Et Ux. v. Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948